Sunday, October 21, 2007

ABC News' blog credits democrats for Rush's charity

This story really requires the willing suspension of disbelief. ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf has the gall to write a blog post in effect crediting Democrats for raising $2.1 million dollars for the Marine Corps - Law Enforcement Foundation, which distributes aid to the families and the children of fallen Marines and law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. Instead of opining on this blatant dishonest posting I suggest you read it for yourself.

ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Who says the political fingerpointing in Washington is all for naught?

Back in September, when Democrats and Republicans were sniping at each other over the Iraq war, Republicans passed a nonbinding resolution in the Senate condemning Moveon.org for calling David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, "General Betrayus" in a newspaper ad.

For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war "phony soldiers."

The furor seemed to have died down as the Senate moved away from voting on a string of Iraq resolutions to voting on domestic spending bills.

But today comes word that a Wasghinton, D.C. area philanthropist, Betty Casey (or bettyc588, as she is known on Ebay) is going to pay over $2 million for a letter Senate Democrats wrote to Mark Mays, President of Clear Channel, asking him to condemn Rush Limbaugh for the "phony soldiers" comment.

All proceeds from the auction of the letter will go to the Marine Corps - Law Enforcement Foundation, which distributes aid to the families to the children of fallen Marines on behalf of law enforcement officers.

Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation and he has reportedly said on his show that he will match the winning bid -- a total of $4.2 million for the foundation.

Rush identified Casey on his show today as a listener since the show's inception. Casey is listed as trustee of the foundation named for her late husband, the real estate developer Eugene B. Casey, who died in 1986 and had worked as director of the Farm Credit Agency under President Franklin Roosevelt.
Betty Casey seems to have disparate political interests. According to campaign finance reports, In past years she has given money mostly to Republican Senate candidates, from Mel Martinez, who succeeded in Florida, to Pete Coors, who was unsuccessful in Colorado.

She gave money to Rudy Giuliani's exploratory committee in 1999 and then Rick Lazio, the Republican who ultimately challenged Senator Hillary Clinton in that the 2000 race for senate in New York.

But this year, Casey gave the maximum individual contribution to Clinton's chief opponent for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Illinois Senator Barack Obama. Both Clinton and Obama signed the letter Casey spent $2.1 million on. In fact, their signatures are right next to each other and the "n" at the end of Clinton runs into the "B" at the beginning of Barack.]

Casey was described in 2004 by the Washington Post as eccentric and press-shy. She had at one point tried to create a lavish $50 million mayoral residence for the mayor of Washington, D.C., but those plans fell through amid squabbling with city officials. Casey donated the land for the mansion to the Salvation Army, stunning city leaders.

Back on October 1st, Harry Reid brought the letter to the Senate floor and asked Republicans to join him condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are "phony soldiers."
No Republicans signed the letter and Limbaugh has made light of it. Also on Ebay, you can buy a t-shirt that reads "Phony 41" on the back. 41 Democratic Senators signed the letter to Limbaugh.

This was a line of political rhetoric that fed off Republicans and their condemnation of Moveon.org for the "General Betrayus" ad. There were nonbinding resolutions and letters written and that was supposed to be it.

At the time, Reid called on Republicans -- who had condemned Moveon.org for the General Betrayus ad -- to sign the letter condemning Limbaugh. But only 41 Democrats, including Reid, signed the letter.

Today, Reid was more conciliatory to Limbaugh and whoever is paying for the letter. Though he said on the Senate floor that as he had watched the bidding throughout the week, he never thought it would get to $2 million.

"Now, everyone knows that Rush Limbaugh and I don't agree on everything in life and maybe that is kind of an understatement," Reid said.

"But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they're auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause. I don't know what we could do more important than helping to ensure that children of our fallen soldiers and police officers who have fallen in the line of duty have the opportunity for their children to have a good education," he said.

The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.

If you'd like let ABC know what you think here.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Thousands of Protesters March to Capitol

By MATTHEW BARAKAT
WASHINGTON (AP) - Thousands of protesters marched Saturday from the White House to the Capitol to demand an end to the Iraq war.

U.S. Capitol Police arrested least seven people who jumped over a barricade near the base of the Capitol. Nearly 100 officers were standing guard, and the protesters were arrested without a struggle.

"What do we want? Troops out. When do we want it? Now," the demonstrators chanted.

The protesters gathered earlier Saturday near the White House in Lafayette Park with signs saying "End the war now" and calling for President Bush's impeachment. The rally was organized by the ANSWER Coalition and other groups.

Army veteran Justin Cliburn, 25, of Lawton, Okla., was among a contingent of Iraq veterans in attendance.

"We're occupying a people who do not want us there," Cliburn said of Iraq. "We're here to show that it isn't just a bunch of old hippies from the 60s who are against this war."

About 13 blocks away, nearly 1,000 counter-protesters gathered near the Washington Monument, frequently erupting in chants of "U-S-A" and waving American flags.

They lined both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue to confront the anti-war protesters as they marched by.

Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Robert "Buzz" Patterson, speaking from a stage to crowds clad in camouflage, American flag bandanas and Harley Davidson jackets, said he wanted to send three messages.

"Congress, quit playing games with our troops. Terrorists, we will find you and kill you," he said. "And to our troops, we're here for you, and we support you."

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., made a surprise visit to the counter- protest, which was organized by the group Gathering of Eagles. The group was created this year by veterans who wanted to challenge war protesters.

"We're a people of faith, courage and fidelity," said Hunter, a 2008 presidential candidate. "It's for this generation that we will win this war on terror."

Hillary refuses to denounce MoveOn ad when asked by reporters

by Allahpundit/Hot Air

She didn’t spend the day kissing ass at Yearly Kos to ruin her detente with the left now. Yesterday Ed Koch called her refusal to knock them for the ad a “terrible error — which is still correctable.” Not anymore, pal. Rudy 1, Glacier 0:

Senator Hillary Clinton said Saturday that she disagrees with Republican Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani when it comes to Iraq but she stopped short of disavowing a controversial ad by the liberal group MoveOn.org…

When pressed as to whether she thought MoveOn should not have run its advertisement, Clinton skirted the question: “Well, I have repeatedly not only expressed my strong admiration and support for our men and women in uniform, but with respect to General Petraeus, I have also made my respect for him abundantly clear and I think that speaks for itself.”

The American

Listen to the original audio: The American

Watch: The American

"The Americans" - Original Script

What would General Patton say?

If General Patton were alive today what would he say about our current war situation?
Watch this video

Friday, September 14, 2007

ABC: CIA Bans Water-Boarding in Terror Interrogations

Lets just hope Brian's scoop on this story didn't come from Alexis Debat.

By Brian Ross, Richard Esposito & Martha Raddatz

Ciabanswater_mn The controversial interrogation technique known as water-boarding, in which a suspect has water poured over his mouth and nose to stimulate a drowning reflex, has been banned by CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden, current and former CIA officials tell ABCNews.com. (Image above is an ABC News graphic.)

The officials say Hayden made the decision at the recommendation of his deputy, Steve Kappes, and received approval from the White House to remove water-boarding from the list of approved interrogation techniques first authorized by a presidential finding in 2002.

The officials say the decision was made sometime last year but has never been publicly disclosed.

(...)

Read here


Should Dems Condemn MoveOn?

Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch thinks so, and writes regarding MoveOn.org's ad charging General David Petraeus "with betrayal of our country, even before he testified" before Congress:

Under the law, of course, Move.On has the right to libel and slander the general - a public personality - with impunity, and be protected from lawsuits. Nevertheless, decent people have an obligation to come to the general's defense and denounce Move.On by no longer supporting it and withholding any future financial contributions to it.
Don't count on it.

Rudy Demands Moveon.Org Rates to Run his Own Ad

Rick Moran at American Thinker wrote:

Clever bit of politicking here by Rudy. He says he wants to run a full page ad supporting General Petraeus in the New York Times. But he wants the same rate granted Moveon.org whose ad last Monday slimed the General: The ad Hillary Clinton didn't denounce and ended up tacitly supporting by saying in order to believe Petreaus, you would have to "suspend belief."

"We are going to ask the New York Times to allow us tomorrow to print an ad that will obviously take the opposite view," Giuliani said. "We believe, unlike Hillary Clinton, that General Petraeus is telling the truth."

This bold move is classic Giuliani. Hizzoner practices the politics of confrontation, in which he chooses a position and relentlessly pursues those who hold the opposite view. In this case, Giuliani's position is support for the war in Iraq and General Petraeus's counterinsurgency strategy. And his opponents make up a trifecta of liberal bogeymen: MoveOn, the Times, and Clinton. By raising the stakes, Giuliani emphasizes to conservatives that he is on their side--something many are not quite ready to believe."
Giuliani has been hemorrhaging votes from the right for more than week - ever since Fred Thompson officially announced his candidacy. Recent polls show Thompson moving up on him nationally and past him a a couple of states.

Whether or not Rudy's ad gets in the Times is not the point. Giuliani is letting everyone know he is not conceding anything to anybody in the Republican party.

Given his history, we would have assumed no less.

Hat Tip: Ed Lasky

Subsidizing Sedition

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY: The New York Times gives moveon.org a discount on a full-page ad smearing Gen. David Petraeus.

Does anyone think for a minute that the Times would grant a similar discount for a group backing Petraeus?

This being a nation where speech is — or should be — absolutely free, moveon.org has every right to express its opinions. And the New York Times has just as much right to publish any opinion it wishes.

That said, there's an ugliness about this moveon.org advertisement that many Americans recognize immediately. And they no doubt agree with Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch who, in unusually blunt language on the Senate floor this week, said of its sponsors:

"These people are nuts."

(...)

Read the whole article here:


The Democrats' Moral Bankruptcy

Congress' Democratic leaders obviously did not listen to what Gen. David Petraeus said this week. Their plan is to lose in Iraq in hopes it will win them the White House. But Americans aren't buying.

House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio might have put it best in a conference call with reporters after arriving in Iraq with other Republican congressmen this week:

"I think that our Democratic colleagues have invested all of their political capital all year in failure in Iraq, and now that we're having success in Iraq and hopefully will continue to have success, I'm not sure they have anyplace to go."

Keep reading: IBD

No, let’s NOT “move on”

Michelle Malkin wrote a special column for the NYPost today on MoveOn.org, the Democrat Party, their in-kind contributors at the NYTimes, and their thug allies who’ll be hitting the streets in DC this weekend. Here’s some excerpts:
THE Democrats don't want to talk about it. They simply cannot, as a party, bring themselves to unequivocally condemn the shameless MoveOn.org slime ad published at a special, military-bashers discount rate by The New York Times. Talk about an in-kind contribution.

Now, the Democrats in Washington are hoping we'll just, you know, move on. Fat chance.

MoveOn's smear of Gen. David Petraeus as a traitor (the group's ad in the Times mocked him as "General Betray Us") is gutter politics. In a time of war, it is morale-undermining character assassination of a dangerous order. Not that the blabbermouths at either institution care, but our enemies are watching us. Watching. And snickering. And cheering the rhetorical grenade that was lobbed at one of America's most honorable and dedicated leaders on the battlefield.

(...)

As vile and disgraceful as that ad was and still is a part of me is glad they printed it and glad the Democrats won't condemn it, sort of. Here's the money quote:
Like Siamese twins, MoveOn and the Democratic Party are conjoined political entities fused at the heart and hip.
Read the whole thing here:

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Report: US to attack Iran in 8-10 months

Germany's unwillingness to impose further sanctions on Iran has pushed the United States closer towards a decision on a military strike, FOX News reported on Wednesday.

A satellite image showing the Natanz nuclear enrichment plant.
Photo: AP [file]

According to the report, Germany's decision has spurred senior US army officials to try and convince US Foreign Secretary Condoleezza Rice to abandon once and for all the diplomatic route of preventing a nuclear Iran. The report further stated that the date of preference for an attack against Iran is in eight to 10 months - after the US presidential candidates for both the Democrats and the Republicans have been chosen, but before the major presidential campaign kicks off.

The report stated that the attack would be comprised of two main strategies: cutting off the Iranian gas supply, which the US hopes would pressure the Iranian people towards action against their government, and an aerial bombing campaign, which would be meant to paralyze Iranian defenses and allow American bombers to destroy the nuclear facilities.

Opponents to a military strike claim that an attack would require at least one week of intense bombing, and that it would only set the Iranian nuclear program back a few years, the report said. Two other claims of the opponents is that an American strike would provoke Iran into attacking Israel, and that abandoning diplomatic action would negatively impact Iraq and the US troops stationed there.

Giuliani demands MoveOn’s New York Times ad rate

September 13, 2007

TheHill.com:Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said Thursday that he is asking The New York Times for the “same heavily discounted rate they gave MoveOn.org” for his campaign to run an ad in Friday’s paper.

Giuliani, calling MoveOn.org’s controversial “General Betray Us” ad “abominable,” said his campaign is asking the paper for a comparable rate for an ad to run following President Bush’s speech on Iraq.

The former mayor said his ad “will obviously take the opposite view” from MoveOn.org, which argued in its ad that Gen. David Petraeus is “cooking the books” on Iraq and cherry-picking facts that support his recommendation to keep a large number of troops in Iraq for some time.

Giuliani continued to include Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in his criticisms for her comments that it would take “a willing suspension of disbelief” to accept at face value Petraeus’s report on the situation in Iraq. Giuliani interpreted Clinton’s remarks at a hearing earlier this week as questioning the general’s integrity.

“We think that her attack on Gen. Petraeus was a follow-up to the MoveOn.org/Times attack,” Giuliani told reporters in Atlanta.

Giuliani reiterated that he agrees with Petraeus’s assessment of the Iraq war, and called MoveOn.org’s ad attacking “an American general in a time of war” unprecedented.

“It’s time for Americans to really insist that American politicians move beyond character assassination,” Giuliani said. “And this is exactly what they tried to do with Gen. Petraeus. Well, it’s one thing when politicians do it to each other. It’s another thing when it’s done to an American general who has put his life at risk to protect us.”


With 'Betray Us' Ad, NYT Practices Character Assassination

Photo of Ken Shepherd.

By Ken Shepherd | September 13, 2007 - 15:22 ET

At Ed Morrissey's secondary blog, Heading Right, the Captain's Quarters editor and Blog Talk Radio host noted that by giving MoveOn.org a discount to smear General Petraeus, the paper of record has exposed itself as a radical activist shill willing to engage in character assassination (emphasis mine):

By writing off more than half of its normal price, it encouraged the publication of a nasty hit piece on the honor of a serving commander in a theater of war. The Paper of Record helped call Petraeus a traitor, surely one of the worst moments in modern American media.

The Sulzberger familiy should apologize to General Petraeus and issue a retraction. Furthermore, it should act to remove Arthur “Pinch” Sulzberger as publisher of the Times and finally put an adult in charge of what used to be the nation’s premiere newspaper. Offering discounts to a rabidly partisan outfit like MoveOn for the purpose of character assassination has stripped the last fantasies of objectivity from the paper and exposed it as the fringe-Left shill that it is.

Morrissey echoes the lament of other conservatives, including NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell, who on "Fox News Live" today said that the Times was effectively a "co-sponsor" of a "despicable" smear ad.

NYT-MoveOn.org's 'Petraeus -- Betray Us' Ad Cited NYT's Own Reporting Wrongly

Photo of Clay Waters.

By Clay Waters | September 13, 2007

The New York Times evidently didn't do much vetting on the adolescent, infamous, and deeply discounted anti-war ad from MoveOn.org that appeared in the front section of Monday's paper.

The ad, headlined "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?", cited the Times' own reporting in defense of its argument that Petraeus is a liar.

"Every independent report on the ground situation in Iraq shows that the surge strategy has failed. Yet the General claims a reduction in violence. That's because, according to the New York Times, the Pentagon has adopted a bizarre formula for keeping tabs on violence. For example, death by car bombs don't count."

Huh? Not even the Times anti-war editorial page has gone that far. Here's an excerpt from an article by Times reporter Michael Gordon from September 8, two days before the MoveOn.org ad appeared, that directly contradicts MoveOn.org's claims. As Gordon makes clear, types of deaths may be classified differently, but they are all counted.

"American officials concede that it is not always easy to distinguish sectarian killings and criminally motivated murders. Victims from car bombs are treated as sectarian casualties if the attack appears to be directed at a sectarian or ethnic group. The August truck bombings that killed hundreds of Yazidis in northern Iraq and the July car bombs that killed many Kurds near Tuz, for example, were classified as sectarian attacks.

"Casualties that result from fighting between groups, like the Mahdi Army and the Badr Corps, however, are not classified as sectarian, as they are the result of clashes between two Shiite organizations. But victims of all car bomb attacks and Shiite and Sunni infighting are included in the overall civilian casualty count."

The New York Post has more on the deep discount MoveOn.org apparently got from the Times.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.

Talk about a willing suspension of disbelief

Talk about a willing suspension of disbelief!
Hillary Adviser: Sandy Berg(l)er

Sandy Berg(l)er is back, and Hillary Clinton’s got him. Beldar expresses suitable outrage.

(Another in my “Short Posts Linking Beldar” series.)